Sedative drug prescription patterns in Danish adults from 2002 through 2021. A register-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Pharmacological treatment strategies for insomnia seem to vary, and there is lack of knowledge about how sedative drugs are used in a real-world setting. We investigated changes in sedative drug prescription patterns in Danish adults who initiated treatment between 2002 and 2016. METHODS: All adults with a first-time purchase of a sedative drug registered in the Danish National Prescription Register from 2002 through 2016 were followed for five years between 2002 and 2021 for subsequent prescriptions of sedative drugs, death, or emigration. Sedative drugs were classified into anxiolytic benzodiazepines (N05BA), hypnotic benzodiazepines (N05CD), Z-drugs (N05CF), melatonin (N05CH01), promethazine (R06AD), and low-dose quetiapine (N05AH04). Analyses were stratified on time: 2002-2006, 2007-2011, and 2012-2016. RESULTS: A total of 842,880 individuals purchased their first sedative drug between 2002 and 2016. Most of them (40.0%) initiated treatment between 2002 and 2006, whereas 29.2% initiated treatment in 2012-2016. In 2002-2006, anxiolytic benzodiazepines (46.4%), Z-drugs (42.8%), and hypnotic benzodiazepines (5.4%) were the most common first treatment. This pattern changed over time with a gradual increase in the use of melatonin, promethazine, and low-dose quetiapine, which in 2011-2016 accounted for 27% of all first treatments. During the five years from first prescription, around 27% shifted to a different sedative drug. This percentage increased slightly over time, but over time the first shift to another drug class was most often to a Z-drug or anxiolytic benzodiazepine. Few individuals (5.8%) had more than one shift and the third choice seemed randomly distributed across all other drug classes. CONCLUSION: Sedative drug prescriptions are distributed on different drug classes, with Z-drugs and anxiolytic benzodiazepines as the most frequent first treatment, and second choice in case of shift.

Prescription patterns in unipolar depression: A nationwide Danish register-based study of 113,175 individuals followed for 10 years.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based use of antidepressant medications is of major clinical importance. We aimed to uncover precription patterns in a large cohort of patients with unipolar depression. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using Danish nationwide registers, we identified individuals with a first-time hospital diagnosis of unipolar depression between January 1st, 2001, and December 31st, 2016. Redemeed prescriptions of antidepressants from five years before to five years after diagnosis were retreived. Lithium and relevant antipsychotics were included. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics including sunburst plots. Cox regressions were used to rank the risk of treatment failure according to antidepressant category and depression severity, as measured by hazard ratios of drug shift. RESULTS: The full study population consisted of 113,175 individuals. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors was the predominantly prescribed first-line group, both before (55.4%) and after (47.7%) diagnosis and across depression severities. Changes of treatment strategy were frequent; 60.8%, 33.7%, and 17.1% reached a second, third, and fourth treatment trial after the hospital diagnosis, respectively. More than half of patients continued their pre-diagnosis antidepressant after diagnosis. The risk of change of treatment strategy was generally lower in mild-moderate depression and higher in severe depression, with tricyclic antidepressants carrying the highest risk in the former and the lowest risks in the latter. Overall, prescribing were often not in accordance with guidelines. CONCLUSION: These findings uncover a potential for improving the clinical care for patients with unipolar depression through optimization of the use of marketed antidepressants.

Impact of offspring and their educational level on readmission and death among older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a nationwide cohort study using multistate survival models.

BACKGROUND: It is well described that there is social inequality in the disease course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but the impact of social relations is less explored. We aimed to investigate the impact of adult offspring and their educational level on readmission and death among older adults with COPD. METHODS: In total, 71 084 older adults born 1935-53 with COPD diagnosed at age ≥65 years in 2000-2018 were included. Multistate survival models were performed to estimate the impact of adult offspring (offspring (reference) vs no offspring) and their educational level (low, medium or high (reference)) on the transition intensities between three states: COPD diagnosis, readmission and all-cause death. RESULTS: During follow-up, 29 828 (42.0%) had a readmission and 18 504 (26.0%) died with or without readmission. Not having offspring was associated with higher hazards of death without readmission (HRwomen: 1.52 (95% CI: 1.39 to 1.67), HRmen: 1.29 (95% CI: 1.20 to 1.39)) and a higher hazard of death after readmission for women only (HRwomen: 1.19 (95% CI: 1.08 to 1.30). Having offspring with low educational level was associated with higher hazards of readmission (HRwomen: 1.12 (95% CI: 1.06 to 1.19)), (HRmen: 1.06 (95%CI: 1.002 to 1.12)), death without readmission (HRwomen: 1.24 (95% CI: 1.11 to 1.39)), HRmen: 1.16 (95% CI: 1.05 to 1.29) and death after readmission for men only (HRmen: 1.15 (95% CI: 1.05 to 1.25)). Having offspring with medium educational level was associated with a higher hazard of death without readmission for women (HRwomen: 1.11 (95% CI: 1.02 to 1.21)). CONCLUSION: Adult offspring and their educational level were associated with higher risk of readmission and death among older adults with COPD.